This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Restartable Sequences system call merged into Linux


Hi!

> >> - rseq_preempt(): on preemption, the scheduler sets the TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME thread
> >>   flag, so rseq_handle_notify_resume() can check whether it's in a rseq critical
> >>   section when returning to user-space,
> >> - rseq_signal_deliver(): on signal delivery, rseq_handle_notify_resume() checks
> >>   whether it's in a rseq critical section,
> >> - rseq_migrate: on migration, the scheduler sets TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME as well,
> > 
> > Yes, this is not likely to be noticeable.
> > 
> > But the proposal wanted to add a syscall to thread creation, right?
> > And I believe that may be noticeable.
> 
> Fair point! Do we have a standard benchmark that would stress this ?

Web server performance benchmarks basically test clone() performance
in many cases.
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]