This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
RFC: Is this a valid program?
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu dot lu at intel dot com>
- To: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:39:59 -0700
- Subject: RFC: Is this a valid program?
- Reply-to: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
---
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <ucontext.h>
#include <unistd.h>
static ucontext_t ctx[5];
static volatile int done;
static void
f1 (void)
{
puts ("start f1");
if (!done)
{
if (getcontext (&ctx[2]) != 0)
{
printf ("%s: getcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (done)
{
puts ("set context in f1");
if (setcontext (&ctx[3]) != 0)
{
printf ("%s: setcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
}
done++;
puts ("swap contexts in f1");
if (swapcontext (&ctx[4], &ctx[2]) != 0)
{
printf ("%s: setcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
puts ("end f1");
exit (done == 2 ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE);
}
int
main (void)
{
char st1[32768];
puts ("making contexts");
if (getcontext (&ctx[0]) != 0)
{
printf ("%s: getcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (getcontext (&ctx[1]) != 0)
{
printf ("%s: getcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
ctx[1].uc_stack.ss_sp = st1;
ctx[1].uc_stack.ss_size = sizeof st1;
ctx[1].uc_link = &ctx[0];
makecontext (&ctx[1], (void (*) (void)) f1, 0);
puts ("swap contexts");
if (swapcontext (&ctx[3], &ctx[1]) != 0)
{
printf ("%s: setcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (done != 1)
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
done++;
puts ("set context");
if (setcontext (&ctx[4]) != 0)
{
printf ("%s: setcontext: %m\n", __FUNCTION__);
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
--
Control flow is CTX1 -> f1 -> CTX2 -> CTX3 -> CTX4
CTX2 and CTX4 are in f1 (). It does CTX2 -> CTX4. Is this supported?
H.J.