This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v4] Enable VDSO on x86_64 statically linked programs.
- From: Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael at espindo dot la>
- To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom at ascii dot art dot br>
- Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "szabolcs.nagy" <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 18:01:03 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Enable VDSO on x86_64 statically linked programs.
- References: <RGVOvESiWL9rORzqdlMj8F4Z-GPqaLH_b-oN-2Sd9BnVpVwllUDIcl9l0SLea0upmTEAWddbNsnqSWferS9awDUGk6N9yiFkQJCMAQd-5C8=@espindo.la> <CAMe9rOrFcjPXE57we-NAvmTq5jSdsyZWp0tJieEc5+TfEFPwVA@mail.gmail.com> <-yy_gcoGxeBfRYWaYqeQoGv_Ncla1BkdHh44XR5pzPx-3e7STsc2mm6v5pwSpqcGjCNJ65xaBtRa3Yl6ATRjT5CRpkEVd0Gv_YPT6KIqceA=@espindo.la> <mvmwop0gp4w.fsf@suse.de> <5xsfJfzVjG6CYwl8_ZXiKw8uaSD0NDUQV-hzL2fgeumBab7KDLlPtZuxQhf0j_FuhHAkBOi581_NqxmkiTlTmrNb9kgh03d4wlnKc9rA48w=@espindo.la> <87efb6xzm4.fsf@linux.ibm.com> <TB0LpdBXtH4X5FZuVE-gKU1nJ5NZNlCryBGYT5xlcCDJJdQ3lZdmbqFkJ7m2iDL-kKJ7l1Q59H7bWCyTxSfG9nGeF3mFV8VJLx_6REXifyU=@espindo.la> <875zwhxsy8.fsf@linux.ibm.com> <87wooxfjgz.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael at espindo dot la>
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:
> * Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho:
>
>> Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael@espindo.la> writes:
>>
>>> "Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho" <tuliom@ascii.art.br> writes:
>>>
>>>> Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael@espindo.la> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> The attached patch does just that. The changelog is
>>>>
>>>> The patch is missing.
>>>
>>> Oops. Attached now.
>>
>> There is nothing here again.
>>
>> Maybe the mailing list is removing your patch?
>
> Then Red Hat email system removes it as well. 8-/
>
> Note that including <sysdep.h> can be problematic because on certain
> architectures, not all assembler files are compatible with <sysdep.h>,
> so if <sysdep-vdso.h> ends in assembler files, that could be a problem.
Looks like powerpc was the only build failure, so it might not be worth
the risk.
I will keep updating one arch at a time as I find time to test it on the
gcc farm.
Cheers,
Rafael