This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: malloc: Add another test for tcache double free check.
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 22:58:46 -0500
- Subject: Re: malloc: Add another test for tcache double free check.
- References: <xnbm65sz0v.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
On 11/30/18 10:32 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> This one tests for RHBZ#1652495 where the double free
> test didn't check the tcache bin bounds before dereferencing
> the bin.
OK for master if you tested it catches the bug, and you fixup
the comments below.
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.co>
Did you test that the test crashes without Florian's fix, but
with your doubl-free code enabled?
Needs a bug number in ChangeLog:
[BZ #23907]
> * malloc/tst-tcfree3.c: New.
> * malloc/Makefile: Add it.
>
> diff --git a/malloc/Makefile b/malloc/Makefile
> index e6dfbfc14c..388cf7e9ee 100644
> --- a/malloc/Makefile
> +++ b/malloc/Makefile
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ tests := mallocbug tst-malloc tst-valloc tst-calloc tst-obstack \
> tst-malloc_info \
> tst-malloc-too-large \
> tst-malloc-stats-cancellation \
> - tst-tcfree1 tst-tcfree2 \
> + tst-tcfree1 tst-tcfree2 tst-tcfree3 \
Ok.
>
> tests-static := \
> tst-interpose-static-nothread \
> diff --git a/malloc/tst-tcfree3.c b/malloc/tst-tcfree3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..1db6d2b220
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/malloc/tst-tcfree3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +/* Test that malloc tcache catches double free.
> + Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> + This file is part of the GNU C Library.
> +
> + The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> +
> + The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
> + Lesser General Public License for more details.
> +
> + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
> + <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
> +
> +#include <malloc.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +
> +/* Prevent GCC from optimizing away any malloc/free pairs. */
> +#pragma GCC optimize ("O0")
> +
> +static int
> +do_test (void)
> +{
> + /* Do two allocation of any size that fit in tcache, and one that
> + doesn't. */
> + int ** volatile a = malloc (32);
> + int ** volatile b = malloc (32);
> + /* This is just under the MMAP threshold. */
s/MMAP/mmap/g
> + int ** volatile c = malloc (127 * 1024);
> +
> + /* The invalid "tcache bucket" we might dereference will likely end
> + up somewhere within this memory block, so make all the accidental
> + "next" pointers cause segfaults. RHBZ#1652495. */
s/RHBZ#1652495/BZ #23907/g
> + memset (c, 0xff, 127 * 1024);
> +
> + free (a); // puts in tcache
> +
> + /* A is now free and contains the key we use to detect in-tcache.
> + Copy the key to the other chunks. */
> + memcpy (b, a, 32);
> + memcpy (c, a, 32);
> +
> + /* This free tests the "are we in the tcache already" loop with a
> + VALID bin but "coincidental" matching key. */
> + free (b); // should NOT abort
> + /* This free tests the "is it a valid tcache bin" test. */
> + free (c); // should NOT abort
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#include <support/test-driver.c>
>
--
Cheers,
Carlos.