This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Restartable Sequences support for glibc 2.30
- From: Carlos O'Donell <codonell at redhat dot com>
- To: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu dot desnoyers at efficios dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:47:41 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Restartable Sequences support for glibc 2.30
- References: <20190212194253.1951-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <878sx6n70n.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
On 3/22/19 1:39 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Mathieu Desnoyers:
The only point that still appears to not reach concensus is whether it's
acceptable to define the RSEQ_SIG code signature for each architecture.
If I missed other points that failed to reach concensus, please let me
know!
I still think the registration mechanism is very problematic and
should be avoided.
The *entire* registration mechanism?
--
Cheers,
Carlos.