This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Sun, Mar 24 2019, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
> ---
> nss/tst-nss-files-alias-leak.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/nss/tst-nss-files-alias-leak.c b/nss/tst-nss-files-alias-leak.c
> index 4ebe186644..946739bd72 100644
> --- a/nss/tst-nss-files-alias-leak.c
> +++ b/nss/tst-nss-files-alias-leak.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ do_test (void)
> else if (ret != ERANGE)
> {
> support_record_failure ();
> - printf ("error: invalid return code %d (user \%s\", size %zu)\n",
> + printf ("error: invalid return code %d (user \"%s\", size %zu)\n",
> ret, users[id], size);
> }
> free (buffer);
Looks obviously correct and I can commit it for you, but I'd like to
remove the signed-off-by statement, as we don't have consensus over
whether we use it in glibc, or not. Is that alright with you?
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |