This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] elf: Fix elf/tst-pldd with --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests (BZ#24506)



On 30/04/2019 18:05, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 4/30/19 3:18 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> Although test-container does support --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests,
>> the resulting library names obtained with pldd will have the 'vanilla'
>> names of 'ld.so' and 'libc.so' instead of the installed ABI names
>> (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 for instance on x86_64).  The patch adds the
>> default names as one possible option.
>>
>> Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu (built with and without
>> --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests) and i686-linux-gnu.
> 
> What does this patch do?
> 
> Please explain in detail the problem and why this is a solution :-)

Sorry if I was not clean in first paragraph.  The patch adds the canonical
names for loader and libc as one option while checking the pldd output.
It is required because when --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests, the tests
are linked against ld.so and libc.so instead of the installed names
(ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 for instance on x86_64).

What about the following line in commit message:

--
Although test-container does support --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests,
the resulting library names obtained with pldd will have the 'vanilla'
names of 'ld.so' and 'libc.so' instead of the installed ABI names
(ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 for instance on x86_64).  The patch adds them
as one option while checking the pldd output.
---

> 
>>     * elf/tst-pldd.c (in_str_list): New function.
>>     (do_test): Add default names for ld and libc as one option.
>> ---
>>   elf/tst-pldd.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/elf/tst-pldd.c b/elf/tst-pldd.c
>> index ed19cedd05..2a9f58936f 100644
>> --- a/elf/tst-pldd.c
>> +++ b/elf/tst-pldd.c
>> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>>   #include <string.h>
>>   #include <unistd.h>
>>   #include <stdint.h>
>> -#include <libgen.h>
>>   #include <stdbool.h>
>>     #include <array_length.h>
>> @@ -39,6 +38,15 @@ target_process (void *arg)
>>   /* The test runs in a container because pldd does not support tracing
>>      a binary started by the loader iself (as with testrun.sh).  */
>>   +static bool
>> +in_str_list (const char *libname, const char *const strlist[])
>> +{
>> +  for (const char *const *str = strlist; *str != NULL; str++)
>> +    if (strcmp (libname, *str) == 0)
>> +      return true;
>> +  return false;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int
>>   do_test (void)
>>   {
>> @@ -89,14 +97,20 @@ do_test (void)
>>       if (buffer[strlen(buffer)-1] == '\n')
>>         buffer[strlen(buffer)-1] = '\0';
>>   -    if (strcmp (basename (buffer), LD_SO) == 0)
>> +    const char *libname = basename (buffer);
>> +
>> +    /* It checks for default names in case of build configure with
>> +       --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests (BZ #24506).  */
>> +    if (in_str_list (libname,
>> +             (const char *const []) { "ld.so", LD_SO, NULL }))
>>         {
>>           TEST_COMPARE (interpreter_found, false);
>>           interpreter_found = true;
>>           continue;
>>         }
>>   -    if (strcmp (basename (buffer), LIBC_SO) == 0)
>> +    if (in_str_list (libname,
>> +             (const char *const []) { "libc.so", LIBC_SO, NULL }))
>>         {
>>           TEST_COMPARE (libc_found, false);
>>           libc_found = true;
>>
> 
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]