This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Benchmark strstr hard needles
- From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- To: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco dot Dijkstra at arm dot com>, "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: nd <nd at arm dot com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 15:49:01 -0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Benchmark strstr hard needles
- References: <VI1PR0801MB2127C0E07A27296FDC38C9AB833E0@VI1PR0801MB2127.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
On 26/04/2019 08:57, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> v2: Add another hard needle case.
>
> Benchmark hard needles both for Two-way and the new strstr algorithm.
> This shows how the worst cases are quite close and both much faster than
> the quadratic basic_strstr. Thanks to Szabolcs for providing various
> hard needles.
>
> ChangeLog:
> 2019-04-25 Wilco Dijkstra <wdijkstr@arm.com>
>
> * benchtests/bench-strstr.c (test_hard_needle): New function.
LGTM with some nits below, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
>
> --
>
> diff --git a/benchtests/bench-strstr.c b/benchtests/bench-strstr.c
> index 31309b24029a96de7381e1050fd89e5d26642e5f..f604460c60002e745a76a30835976df95f753234 100644
> --- a/benchtests/bench-strstr.c
> +++ b/benchtests/bench-strstr.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,74 @@ do_test (size_t align1, size_t align2, size_t len1, size_t len2,
> putchar ('\n');
> }
>
> +
> +char * volatile null = NULL;
> +
I am not seeing why exactly it requires a global non static volatile
variable to call do_one_test.
> +static void
> +test_hard_needle (size_t ne_len, size_t hs_len)
> +{
Maybe add some context from where these tests came from, from the
libc-alpha discussion?
> + char *ne = (char *) buf1;
> + char *hs = (char *) buf2;
> +
> + /* Hard needle for strstr algorithm using skip table. */
> + {
> + memset (ne, 'a', ne_len);
> + ne[ne_len] = '\0';
> + ne[ne_len - 14] = 'b';
> +
> + memset (hs, 'a', hs_len);
> + for (size_t i = ne_len; i <= hs_len; i += ne_len)
> + {
> + hs[i-5] = 'b';
> + hs[i-62] = 'b';
> + }
> +
> + printf ("Length %4zd/%3zd, complex needle 1:", hs_len, ne_len);
> +
> + FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
> + do_one_test (impl, hs, ne, null);
> + putchar ('\n');
> + }
> +
> + /* 2nd hard needle for strstr algorithm using skip table. */
> + {
> + memset (ne, 'a', ne_len);
> + ne[ne_len] = '\0';
> + ne[ne_len - 6] = 'b';
> +
> + memset (hs, 'a', hs_len);
> + for (size_t i = ne_len; i <= hs_len; i += ne_len)
> + {
> + hs[i-5] = 'b';
> + hs[i-6] = 'b';
> + }
> +
> + printf ("Length %4zd/%3zd, complex needle 2:", hs_len, ne_len);
> +
> + FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
> + do_one_test (impl, hs, ne, null);
> + putchar ('\n');
> + }
> +
> + /* Hard needle for Two-way algorithm. */
> + {
> + for (int i = 0; i < hs_len; i++)
> + hs[i] = (rand () & 255) > 155 ? 'a' : 'b';
> + hs[hs_len] = 0;
> +
> + memset (ne, 'a', ne_len);
> + ne[ne_len-2] = 'b';
> + ne[0] = 'b';
> + ne[ne_len] = 0;
> +
> + printf ("Length %4zd/%3zd, complex needle 3:", hs_len, ne_len);
> +
> + FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
> + do_one_test (impl, hs, ne, null);
> + putchar ('\n');
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int
> test_main (void)
> {
> @@ -227,6 +295,10 @@ test_main (void)
> do_test (14, 5, hlen, klen, 1);
> }
>
> + test_hard_needle (64, 65536);
> + test_hard_needle (256, 65536);
> + test_hard_needle (1024, 65536);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
>