This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [EXT] Re: Conform failures in glibc?

* Steve Ellcey:

> On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 19:10 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> 
>> These should be XFAILed and not really count as failures.
>> 
>> I find these errors confusing as well.  On the one hand, I think want
>> the conform test expectations to reflect POSIX as closely as possible,
>> but on the other hand, I do not see value in carrying around such fringe
>> XFAILs forever.  The <varargs.h> one in particular will never get fixed
>> at this point.  We know that, so reporting it over and over again is
>> just noise.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Florian
>
> I actually hadn't run into these before.  I have recently changed my 
> build setup so maybe that is what caused me to start seeing these.

> FAIL: conform/POSIX2008/arpa/inet.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/POSIX2008/netdb.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/POSIX2008/netinet/in.h/conform

You need to check the .out files.  It could be the Linux 5.1 UAPI
header issue.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]