This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for arm
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- To: Phil Blundell <pb at pbcl dot net>
- Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro dot koskinen at iki dot fi>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 13:15:30 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove ioperm etc. support for arm
- References: <20190529184028.GC24195@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <87ef4hp08c.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190529201227.GD24195@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <87imttnewj.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190606215312.GB11598@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <87d0j0lap3.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190626150053.lwldsqs3j2ahbima@pbcl.net> <87ef3gjrpn.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190626153336.b6yqt3uirkdwwnov@pbcl.net> <87sgrwibmo.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20190702095856.xeycrqoziiudt6yc@pbcl.net>
* Phil Blundell:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 05:56:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Phil Blundell:
>> > I think so. I will give it a try later and see if I can confirm
>> > that it's doing the right thing, but assuming that the -march=
>> > setting is indeed ending up on the compiler command line then I
>> > think the answer is that the patch is correct.
>>
>> Thanks, that would be useful information to have. If it all works out,
>> I will push my patch.
>
> I (finally!) inspected the output from build-many-glibcs.py with your
> patch and it looks correct for ARMv4T. So I think you can go ahead
> and push that. Sorry it took me so long.
Thanks, I've pushed my patch.
Florian