This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Use compat_symbol for _finite symbols


On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:

> diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/float128/float128_private.h b/sysdeps/ieee754/float128/float128_private.h
> index f3917b463837e9eb19d18c62ba232d9bb077e9a1..c7bb208efb024030f0ae7cc71a01dab1d42c4fa1 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/ieee754/float128/float128_private.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/float128/float128_private.h
> @@ -365,3 +365,12 @@ mul_splitf128 (_Float128 *hi, _Float128 *lo, _Float128 x, _Float128 y)
>    *lo = (((x1 * y1 - *hi) + x1 * y2) + x2 * y1) + x2 * y2;
>  #endif
>  }
> +
> +/* Ensure compat_symbol uses GLIBC_2_26 since that was when the
> +   __<fn>f128_finite symbols were introduced.  */
> +#include <shlib-compat.h>
> +#if SHLIB_COMPAT (libm, GLIBC_2_26, GLIBC_2_30)
> +# undef compat_symbol
> +# define compat_symbol(lib, local, symbol, version) \
> +  compat_symbol_reference (lib, local, symbol, GLIBC_2_26)
> +#endif

This is implicitly embedding an action-at-a-distance assumption that the 
only case for using compat_symbol in float128 code is for functions added 
in 2.26 and obsoleted in 2.30.  That seems excessively fragile to me.

How about having

#define FINITE_VERSION GLIBC_2_15

somewhere, with float128_private.h overriding that to GLIBC_2_26, and then 
all the relevant SHLIB_COMPAT and compat_symbol calls using FINITE_VERSION 
instead of GLIBC_2_15?  That way you avoid causing nonobvious problems for 
any post-2.26 *f128 symbols that might get obsoleted in future.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]