This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi Joseph,
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2019, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
> > Tests:
> > - The code has been tested with x86_64/x86 (native compilation):
> > make PARALLELMFLAGS="-j8" && make xcheck PARALLELMFLAGS="-j8"
> >
> > - Run specific tests on ARM/x86 32bit systems (qemu):
> > https://github.com/lmajewski/meta-y2038
> > and run tests:
> > https://github.com/lmajewski/y2038-tests/commits/master
> > on kernels with and without 64 bit time support.
>
> Could you give more details of the configurations (including kernel
> headers version, --enable-kernel version, kernel version used at
> runtime) for which you have built glibc and run the full glibc
> testsuite? I suspect this code is pretty close to being ready to go
> in - but such patches have plenty of scope for mistakes (such as were
> in earlier RV32 patch versions) such as typos, transposed parameters,
> etc., that are hard for humans to spot reliably and easy for
> compilers and testsuites to spot, so it's important to know that
> sufficient automated tests have been run to catch any such mistakes.
>
So I tested this on ARM32 QEMU BSP build with meta-y2038 [1].
I. Build testing:
- Machine's
MACHINE=qemux86-64-x32
MACHINE=qemux86-64
MACHINE=qemux86
MACHINE=qemuarm
- Using glib's
test-wrapper='/opt/Y2038/glibc/src/scripts/cross-test-ssh.sh
for qemu ARM.
- ../src/scripts/build-many-glibcs.py
II. Runtime testing - with BSP [1]:
runqemu -d y2038arm nographic
- PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-y2038 = "5.1%" &&
Y2038_GLIBC_MIN_KERNEL_VERSION="5.1.0"
--enable-kernel=${Y2038_GLIBC_MIN_KERNEL_VERSION}
Linux y2038arm 5.1.21-y2038-4a9b1eb8bc3ba4ad8b3b1aa3317cf8d4a3aaad83
(Support __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS defined)
- Only PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-y2038 = "5.1%" - the minimal kernel
version is default one for current mainline glibc
(The __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS not defined, but kernel supports
__clock_settime64 syscalls).
- PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-lts = "4.19%"
with default minimal kernel version for contemporary glibc
(SHA1: 87accae3978c77c1a50d19ea8e3da3f0248d2612)
This kernel doesn't support __clock_settime64 syscalls, so we
fallback to clock_settime.
Above tests are performed with Y2038 redirection applied [2] as well as
without (so the __TIMESIZE != 64 execution path is checked as well).
III. Syscalls unit tests - test_y2038 program [3] installed on BSP.
IV. For x86_64 I do run the - as I can do it on my HOST PC
make PARALLELMFLAGS="-j8" && make xcheck PARALLELMFLAGS="-j8"
(before and after the patchset).
> I gave a list in
> <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-08/msg00234.html> of five
> configurations I think are relevant to cover the different cases in
> patches such as this ("new" = 5.1 or later; Florian's changes to
> provide syscall tables in glibc would allow "#ifdef
> __NR_clock_settime64" to be removed and eliminate case (b)):
>
> (a) one that has always had 64-bit time, e.g. x86_64;
>
Point IV.
> (b) one with 32-bit time and old kernel headers (any kernel version
> at runtime);
Point II.
>
> (c) one with 32-bit time and new kernel headers, old kernel at
> runtime;
>
> (d) one with 32-bit time and new kernel headers, new kernel at
> runtime but no --enable-kernel;
>
> (e) one with 32-bit time and new kernel at runtime and new
> --enable-kernel.
Point II.
>
I will double check if the above points are in sync with points a) to
e).
> If some of these are problematic to test, you can ask for help
> testing them. For *this particular* patch you might not need to test
> both (c) and (d), because they are identical as far as compilation is
> concerned and the testsuite doesn't really cover execution of
> clock_settime anyway. But it's in the nature of the Y2038 changes -
> involving lots of conditional code - that it's necessary to test in
> several different configurations to cover the conditionals adequately.
QEMU (and OE/Yocto) helps here ...
>
> (For avoidance of doubt, it is *not* necessary to run
> build-many-glibcs.py for this patch, and nor would running
> build-many-glibcs.py be sufficient since it doesn't do execution
> testing or cover the kernel headers version and --enable-kernel
> variants.)
>
The build-many-glibcs helps with checking if there aren't some odd
build breaks. It is one of many test approaches for testing the Y2038
problem.
Note:
[1] - https://github.com/lmajewski/meta-y2038
[2] -
https://github.com/lmajewski/y2038_glibc/commit/1229b54508d0bb130a017a5b5591209167255665
[3] - https://github.com/lmajewski/y2038-tests/commits/master
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de
Attachment:
pgp0DW50GjvoN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |