This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [review] manual: Clarify strnlen, wcsnlen, strndup null termination behavior
On Okt 30 2019, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andreas Schwab:
>
>> On Okt 30 2019, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>>> * Andreas Schwab:
>>>
>>>> On Okt 30 2019, Florian Weimer (Code Review) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +Note that @var{s} must be an array of at least @var{maxlen} bytes. It
>>>>> +is undefined to call @code{strnlen} on a shorter array, even if it is
>>>>> +known that the shorter array contains a null terminator.
>>>>
>>>> This is not true. strnlen _always_ stops before the null byte.
>>>
>>> This is not how it is specified in POSIX.
>>
>> Yes, it is.
>>
>> The strnlen() function shall return the number of bytes preceding
>> the first null byte in the array to which s points, if s contains a
>> null byte within the first maxlen bytes; otherwise, it shall return
>> maxlen.
>>
>> There is nothing undefined here. Your interpretation would be
>> completely useless anyway.
>
> It says “array”
Yes, because a null terminator is not required.
> But it does NOT say that reading stops after the first null terminator.
Yes, it does, see above. Otherwise it doesn't make sense.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
- References:
- [review] manual: Clarify strnlen, wcsnlen, strndup null termination behavior
- From: Florian Weimer (Code Review)
- Re: [review] manual: Clarify strnlen, wcsnlen, strndup null termination behavior
- Re: [review] manual: Clarify strnlen, wcsnlen, strndup null termination behavior
- Re: [review] manual: Clarify strnlen, wcsnlen, strndup null termination behavior
- Re: [review] manual: Clarify strnlen, wcsnlen, strndup null termination behavior