This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit

From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:08:10 -0500
Subject: Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
References: <7bb58c00-d2f3-a299-0927-00f1acd3afda@redhat.com> <87v9ra965r.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911251814450.24062@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On 11/25/19 1:16 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Florian Weimer wrote:
> 
>> * Carlos O'Donell:
>>
>>> I'm happy to hear any feedback those of you have about
>>> working with gerrit.
>>
>> I would also like to hear from those who have not used it.  Your
>> opinion counts as well.
> 
> We seem to have got notifications into a reasonably good state, though I'm 
> not sure if the issue was fixed where marking a patch ready for review 
> failed to send out a notification including diffs.  I think there are 
> still issues with the handling of email replies.

I'm not sure what you mean by "failed to send out a notification" for 
marking a patch ready for review? Could you please expand on that?

When it comes to handling of email replies, yes, there are still some
deficiencies against what I could consider a _practical_ optimum
solution.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
  - From: Florian Weimer

References:
- FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: FYI: Status of gdb usage of gerrit
  - From: Joseph Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]