This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Steward opinions on gerrit?


On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> As stewards for glibc I wanted to ask each of you if you had
> any opinions on gerrit, and thoughts on or the fundamental
> requirements of a review system for a project like glibc.
> 
> Joseph, 
> 
> You write and review a lot of patches. Does using gerrit
> interest you? Does it solve any problems?

I'm not convinced the experiment is advanced enough to tell whether it 
helps much.  The main problem I see patch review systems as being for is 
to track changes that are under consideration but not yet approved, and 
it's hard to judge when there are only a few changes in there.  (I suspect 
any system would gradually accumulate patches that were submitted by 
one-off contributors, issues raised, but never revised and never 
definitively rejected either.)

There's potential for various kinds of CI integration with patch tracking, 
but I don't think we've tried that.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]