This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Fix selection of GNU and ISO C99 scanf
On Mon, 09 Dec 2019, Paul E Murphy wrote:
>There are two tests wrapped in each: One to verify the headers select
>the appropriate variant, secondly verifying the long double
>implementation is correct. The former is sometimes more complicated
>than ibm128 or ieee128.
Right.
>I am not suggesting this work be included in this patchset, but would it
>be approaching something like `assert (&(scanf) == &FPTR_EXPECTED
>(scanf))` to this and similar printf tests (e.g fortified printf)? Such
>could quickly tell us if we need to update our tests.
Sounds good, maybe we could write something similar to elf/tst-addr1.c [1],
with hardcoded function names.
[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=elf/tst-addr1.c;h=68ff74aabd4dbe5b4dc1c98ebd2df2f66e080890;hb=HEAD