This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Move new totalorder from libm to libc
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:58:54 +0000
- Subject: Re: Move new totalorder from libm to libc
- Ironport-sdr: idpwgzGb3nVnuBPxJmgXrH5dvw7UCb+eGmVpniy4UAnIgH3VsOxPnsdqv7kxkcfXj1r/FLjhUB +5BAHqHskJ0rnjggPnZbyd7eo7ZNRICEBgti5SoaH3e3dcAHTdbXiAyYfDpu9OjEpgvhHm5eRR Qf8QsswxWzdeVAx8xjwU7HzEmy5euVZn1+BQ2UWzSPsrvJO2dG9LmJx0aZ9BPB5PZjqvwN0NQ+ 1DuDqgX1RugW1wCOW1n4DFL0GGCGtPdNNZG5BlaaJbBbrIq9sKAPwC8N4Fyb99NUFya3FCCP/I +M0=
- Ironport-sdr: Cm+vRNS+Z0U59D2PFq4KF4ixC2QGrw4FFoqK7icvI30AgIcQYInmpVGlROtS/FUFiw0vsvKCr4 uThyPJ1w6lTXW4Xr9rZsjQ/M0V2Axtynzf1I6Mk4/y+fHbIgc0NZpbwT+K3LIWBhnKQLrBbE/1 aYOHf/5oE/P3xoVfdWnotuPyGJ+m/Ca5LsXjlvbRR0D36Ujet2442d5Gc7BmLjcqP7yMtblNEu xAFY5uHI48vZKerS7bCGuA2/g/jvtvmeomuPJd8gdskVycdfhDwfvA8+no/H27bnS8B0h1XL/6 OuQ=
- References: <87tv62daqi.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Should we define the new totalorder in libc, so that it is harder to
> get the wrong version at run time due to underlinking?
>
> Or is totalorder so obscure as an interface that this should not
> matter?
I think it's a pretty obscure symbol.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com