This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Build raise with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at sourceware dot org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 14:29:06 +0530
Subject: Re: Build raise with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2001240032350.7536@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <c19f0288-f9a3-7ff8-4c83-7f1ea9a03216@sourceware.org> <871rrp5plx.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>

On 24/01/20 12:05 pm, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> The fix seems fine, but I wonder how the test passes on other
>> architectures.
> 
> Many architectures default to -fasynchronous-unwind-tables in GCC.
> 
> The patch seems reasonable to me.

Thanks, looks good to me for master then.

Siddhesh

References:
- Build raise with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: Build raise with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: Build raise with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]