This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] nptl: add missing pthread-offsets.h

From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 20:57:02 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nptl: add missing pthread-offsets.h
References: <mvmtv44kjim.fsf@suse.de> <87blqbsgfv.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <5650eefe-a455-5532-860e-de5461fdfc99@linaro.org>

* Adhemerval Zanella:

> On 06/02/2020 15:45, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Andreas Schwab:
>> 
>>> All architectures using their own definition of struct
>>> __pthread_rwlock_arch_t need to provide their own pthread-offsets.h.
>> 
>> What's the context for this change?
>> 
>
> My understanding is tying the __PTHREAD_RWLOCK_FLAGS_OFFSET definition
> to a arch-specific file if the architecture overrides the generic
> __pthread_rwlock_arch_t definition.

Okay, then let me ask differently: Why hasn't this discrepancy shown
up in testing so far?

References:
- [PATCH] nptl: add missing pthread-offsets.h
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] nptl: add missing pthread-offsets.h
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] nptl: add missing pthread-offsets.h
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]