This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] support: Kill process group for test failure
- From: Carlos O'Donell <codonell at redhat dot com>
- To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:53:01 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] support: Kill process group for test failure
- References: <20200220143406.4768-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
On 2/20/20 9:34 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Some testcases that create multiple subprocesses might abort or exit
> prior waiting for their children. In such case, support_test_main
> does not try to kill the spawned test process group (as in the
> test timeout case).
>
> On example that we are observing in internal tests is when
> malloc/tst-mallocfork2 fails to fork in the signal handling (due
> either maximum number of process or other non expected failure).
>
> This patch kill the process group in the case of failed execution,
> similar on how it is done on timeout.
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
> Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
> ---
> support/support_test_main.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/support/support_test_main.c b/support/support_test_main.c
> index e3f0bf15f2..ac9f710fb7 100644
> --- a/support/support_test_main.c
> +++ b/support/support_test_main.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,9 @@ support_test_main (int argc, char **argv, const struct test_config *config)
> /* Process terminated normaly without timeout etc. */
> if (WIFEXITED (status))
> {
> + /* It is expected that a successful test execution handles all its
> + children. */
OK.
> +
> if (config->expected_status == 0)
> {
> if (config->expected_signal == 0)
> @@ -486,6 +489,10 @@ support_test_main (int argc, char **argv, const struct test_config *config)
> /* Process was killed by timer or other signal. */
> else
> {
> + /* Kill the whole process group if test process aborts or exits prior
> + waiting for them. */
> + kill (-test_pid, SIGKILL);
OK. Send negation of process group id to kill the whole process group. The
process group id is the same as the id of the process that created the group
so test_pid is the right value.
Notes:
- Should we be using test_pgid to make this clear?
- Should this cleanup be refactored a bit to avoid duplication from
signal_handler() and support_test_main() e.g. kill_process_group ()
which runs kill looks for errors prints diagnostic etc.
> +
> if (config->expected_signal == 0)
> {
> printf ("Didn't expect signal from child: got `%s'\n",
>
--
Cheers,
Carlos.