This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 23/26] x86_64: Do not define __NR_semtimedop in <sysdep.h>



On 09/02/2020 17:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The definition is always available from the built-in system call table.

LGTM, thanks. 

Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>

> ---
>  sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sysdep.h | 7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sysdep.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sysdep.h
> index c2eb37e575..b8aa1a2b2f 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sysdep.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sysdep.h
> @@ -33,13 +33,6 @@
>  #undef SYS_ify
>  #define SYS_ify(syscall_name)	__NR_##syscall_name
>  
> -/* This is to help the old kernel headers where __NR_semtimedop is not
> -   available.  */
> -#ifndef __NR_semtimedop
> -# define __NR_semtimedop 220
> -#endif
> -
> -
>  #ifdef __ASSEMBLER__
>  
>  /* Linux uses a negative return value to indicate syscall errors,
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]