This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
- From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
- To: YunQiang Su <syq at debian dot org>
- Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent at vivier dot eu>, torvalds at linux-foundation dot org, Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation dot org>, akpm at linux-foundation dot org, Al Viro <viro at zeniv dot linux dot org dot uk>, James Bottomley <James dot Bottomley at hansenpartnership dot com>, linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org, linux-fsdevel at vger dot kernel dot org, linux-arch at vger dot kernel dot org, linux-api at vger dot kernel dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:40:39 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
- References: <20200306080905.173466-1-syq@debian.org> <87r1y53npd.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <8441f497-61eb-5c14-bf1e-c90a464105a7@vivier.eu> <87mu8t3mlw.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <40da389d-4e74-2644-2e7c-04d988fcc26f@vivier.eu> <CAKcpw6WEO5Rmsv+WFkOMrkH+0jwtFKKy7b2n3U9xgv-xGC0UUQ@mail.gmail.com>
* YunQiang Su:
> AT_* only has 32 slot and now. I was afraid that maybe we shouldn't take one.
> /* AT_* values 18 through 22 are reserved */
> 27,28,29,30 are not used now.
> Which should we use?
Where does this limit of 32 tags come from? I don't see it from a
userspace perspective.