[PATCH 3/6] Avoid implicit floating point conversions
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Thu Aug 20 22:43:23 GMT 2020
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, Keith Packard via Newlib wrote:
> diff --git a/newlib/libc/include/complex.h b/newlib/libc/include/complex.h
> index 0a3ea97ed..13b300021 100644
> --- a/newlib/libc/include/complex.h
> +++ b/newlib/libc/include/complex.h
> @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@
> #define _COMPLEX_H
>
> #define complex _Complex
> -#define _Complex_I 1.0fi
> +#define _Complex_I 1.0i
> +#define _Complex_If 1.0if
> #define I _Complex_I
> +#define I_f _Complex_If
This is contrary to the standard requirement that _Complex_I and I have
type const float _Complex.
> # ifndef INFINITY
> -# define INFINITY (__builtin_inff())
> +# define INFINITY (__builtin_inf())
> +# endif
This is contrary to the standard requirement that INFINITY has type float.
> # ifndef NAN
> -# define NAN (__builtin_nanf(""))
> +# define NAN (__builtin_nan(""))
> +# endif
This is contrary to the standard requirement that NAN has type float.
> #ifndef NO_ERRNO
> - if (isinf (retval) && !isinf (val))
> + if (isinff (retval) && !isinff (val))
isinf, isnan, etc. are *type-generic* macros. If newlib is declaring them
in a non-type-generic way, that should be fixed, rather than changing
users to use a type-specific function.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Newlib
mailing list