RE: precompiled probing scenarios

["Stone, Joshua I" <joshua dot i dot stone at intel dot com>]

On Friday, October 20, 2006 6:50 AM, David Smith wrote:
> Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>> Note that currently several tests in the testsuite fail after a
>>> first run to seed the cache because they don't expect to see the
>>> skip from pass 2 to pass 5.
>> 
>> How do you mean they fail?  -p3 or -p4 should still work.
> 
> Here's what goes on.  The '-p3' and '-p4' options still work.  But,
> several run ('-p5') tests use testsuite/lib/stap_run.exp or
> testsuite/lib/stap_run2.exp.  Those two tcl files expect to see "Pass
> [12345]" in the output.  They get confused when only seeing "Pass
> [125]" and then think the test has timed out.

Would it make sense to print "dummy" pass 3/4 messages when a cached
version is used?  Something like:

Pass 1: parsed user script and 53 library script(s) in
310usr/0sys/326real ms.
Pass 2: analyzed script: 1 probe(s), 0 function(s), 0 global(s) in
10usr/0sys/5real ms.
Pass 3: (cached) in 0usr/0sys/0real ms.
Pass 4: (cached) in 0usr/0sys/0real ms.
Pass 5: starting run.

The timing info doesn't need to be hardcoded zero, I just expect it
would be very small.

Side question - do you still use caching when someone calls '-p3' or
'-p4'?  And with verbosity increased, what would this output, given that
you're not actually doing the work?  (e.g., you wouldn't have a compiler
output on a cached pass-4.)


Josh