This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: conf call: utrace futures

From: Elena Zannoni <elena dot zannoni at oracle dot com>
To: Jim Keniston <jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com>
Cc: systemtap <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:25:33 -0400
Subject: Re: conf call: utrace futures
Organization: Oracle USA Inc.
References: <1185229862.4634.10.camel@dyn9047018076.beaverton.ibm.com>

Jim Keniston wrote:

Application tracing requirements/utrace exploitation
Notes from conference call 7/23/07

What about syslets?  (I missed some of this discussion because I
misheard the original question.)  "Still pie in the sky."

Yeah, I was asking how close to impact utrace and syslets were. It seems still not that close, and Roland also mentioned that's not a complex problem once the semantics are pinned down. So we don't have to worry about syslets quite yet.

elena

References:
- conf call: utrace futures
  - From: Jim Keniston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]