This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: About FAILs in the internal testsuite


On 04/15/2016 06:03 AM, peter wang wrote:
> Hello David,
> 
> Thanks again for your reply.
> There is one more thing which confused me.
> 
> I'm not sure if I have some misunderstandings.
> Some failures are resulted by either case's bug or systemtap's bug and
> others should be set to KFAIL.
> 
> In other words, all FAIL should be fixed whatever arch or system is.
> Is that right?

All FAILs should certainly be investigated to see out what is going on.
There have been times when I've done that and left the FAIL in place.
Here's why. In the past, I've found a few KFAIL tests that were no
longer failing because of the orignal reason (most likely bad
debuginfo), but failing because the underlying probe point has changed.

If the problem is truly a problem in systemtap, it would be great to get
it fixed.

-- 
David Smith
dsmith@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]