This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug runtime/18714] bring back process.statement.absolute probes


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18714

agentzh <agentzh at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |agentzh at gmail dot com

--- Comment #1 from agentzh <agentzh at gmail dot com> ---
We'll take a stab at implementing `process.statement(0xaddr)` first for
inode-based uprobes, with relative addresses in the executable files (including
DSO and PIE). This will pave a way to true DWARF-less probing (with the
existing @vma() facility which will get merge soon) as well as implementing our
own uretprobes without all the consequences from the kernel's uretprobes.
Messed up C stacks are really problematic for stack unwinding and resizable
stacks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]