This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tapsets/23879] print_ubacktrace can not print function name


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23879

Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fche at redhat dot com

--- Comment #2 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> ---
It depends how the two versions of the target program were compiled.  Perhaps
the second one was stripped (including symbol info), so stap (and tools like
gdb) would have no chance to resolve addresses to names.  Perhaps the unwind
data was not generated the same way (possibly CFLAGS without
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables?).

A comparison with "readelf -S" between the two binaries could help clear this
up.

Also, that advice re. rerunning with -DDEBUG_UNWIND is a good one, the data
would help.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]