Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?

[Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>]

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 05 Jun 2016 19:00, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
>> I think I can also remove this from xrealloc, since our realloc does
>> the right thing when p==NULL.
>>
>> +  if (p == 0)
>> +    return xmalloc (n);
>
> right, we don't want/need that
>
> i think all the use of 0 should be changed to NULL too

I'll submit attached patch tomorrow if there are no further comments.

Thanks,

2016-06-07  Paul Pluzhnikov  <ppluzhnikov@google.com>

        * test-skeleton.c (oom_error, xmalloc, xcalloc, xrealloc):
        New functions.
        (add_temp_file): Use them.


-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov

Attachment: glibc-xmalloc-test-20160607.txt
Description: Text document