This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
On Apr 03 2018, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:
> Joseph would know better than me, but I _think_ it's still necessary
> to avoid using the application-namespace names. For instance, a
> program that uses fork, but not siglongjmp, might have defined its own
> siglongjmp
I don't think so, since both fork and siglongjmp are part of POSIX (any
version), but neither is part of any narrower standard.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
- References:
- [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs
- Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs