This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] RFC: avoid cancellable I/O primitives in ld.so

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:47:03 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: avoid cancellable I/O primitives in ld.so
References: <20180404014319.7339-1-zackw@panix.com> <e6114b26-bf1a-4236-c1bf-6c37696dfe49@linaro.org> <CAKCAbMh0WoyPrY_8SPxibDoTzvZ+6qgc+hnq5S-4Ftsvj5N9cQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Apr 03 2018, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:

> The Makefile logic for deciding which libc objects will be recompiled
> as part of librtld.a does not know this, so libc-cancellation.c,
> unwind.c, and unwind-forcedunwind.c get dragged into ld.so
> unnecessarily.

Are they?  I don't see that here, they are just needlessly compiled.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: avoid cancellable I/O primitives in ld.so
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- [PATCH] RFC: avoid cancellable I/O primitives in ld.so
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: avoid cancellable I/O primitives in ld.so
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: avoid cancellable I/O primitives in ld.so
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]