This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] nptl: Move nanosleep implementation to libc

* Adhemerval Zanella:

> I will check for all affected ABI, but I think there is no need.  In fact
> I am not sure if Joseph rationale at b289cd9db8286fa6c670104dd5dfcfc68d5d00d6
> is currently true, we now need at least one absolute ABI symbol in at least
> one library.

Hah, I thought I had broken the ABI test.

I don't think the symbol matters, so that part is actually true, but we
do need to check the presence of the .gnu.version_d entry in a test
because that's what the loader expects (and as discussed, we do not want
to change that, at least not for lazy binding).

Thanks,
Florian
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]