This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Fix __libc_signal_block_all on sparc64

On Dez 12 2019, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:

> Well I am seeing such behaviour with gcc 9.2.1 on x86_64 at least:

That's a missed optimisation bug in gcc then.  There should not be a
difference between a const compound literal and a static const object,
if only constant expressions are used for initialisation.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]