This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Move new totalorder from libm to libc

From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabriel at inconstante dot net dot br>
To: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:56:33 -0300
Subject: Re: Move new totalorder from libm to libc
References: <87tv62daqi.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20191216140714.558e1313@tereshkova> <87o8w8192v.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20191217115527.22e08b95@tereshkova> <875ziezq2j.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Florian Weimer wrote:
>If I said there would be crash, I think I was wrong.  The function
>selected is the pointer-less variant, and that would just produce
>wrong results and not crash.  So it's as hard to debug as the long
>double mismatch.

You haven't.  I mistakenly thought about it the other way around.
Thanks for correcting me.

References:
- Move new totalorder from libm to libc
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Move new totalorder from libm to libc
  - From: Gabriel F. T. Gomes
- Re: Move new totalorder from libm to libc
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Move new totalorder from libm to libc
  - From: Gabriel F. T. Gomes
- Re: Move new totalorder from libm to libc
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]